FLUORIDE DATE LECTURE #44 - TWO MORE NATIONAL BLACK LEADERS JOIN FIGHT AGAINST FLUORIDATION

                                                 
                                  Andrew Young                                                           Bernice King

Good afternoon, Mayor and councilmembers. Next Wednesday morning, May 18, the Council’s Committee on Public Health and Human services will meet here in City Hall with representatives on both sides of the fluoridation debate for a "work session" That event could prove a historic turning point, if only you are willing to think outside the box and carefully consider the scientific information our experts will provide.

I urge you to place scientific evidence above cut-and-paste dogma. When you hear "safe and effective" ask yourselves how that can be so in the light of today’s evidence. When you hear "CDC best practices," remember that those are the same "best practices" that have resulted in fluorosis-disfigured teeth for approaching half of our young people today. (They call this mild).

                                         

True, endorsement by the CDC sounds impressive—at first. When we think of CDC, we picture its grandiose Atlanta headquarters and army of 15,000 employees. Well, scratch that. The CDC’s Division of Oral Health comprises about 28 dentist-bureaucrats without medical or toxological training, well rewarded to promote community fluoridation. They’re PR people, basically. That’s it.

And there’s strong resistance brewing in Atlanta, the CDC’s backyard. Atlanta is city of 540,000, 58% black. There, the African-American community is mobilizing against what was sold as a social entitlement but is now recognized as environmental racism.

Last month, Andrew Young—iconic MLK-era civil rights leader, former Atlanta mayor, former UN Ambassador, 3-time member of the U.S. House of Representative—and a dentist’s son—came out forcefully against fluoridation. Noting that cavities are rampant in inner cities that have been fluoridated for decades and that both cavity and fluorosis rates are higher among blacks, he said: —quote— "I am most deeply concerned for poor families who have babies: if they cannot afford unfluoridated water for their babies’ milk formula, do their babies not count?... This is an issue of fairness, civil rights, and compassion."

Two days ago, Martin Luther King’s daughter Bernice King issued an equally forthright statement calling for an end to the practice and for "Fluoridegate" investigations into the deception which has always surrounded it.

The cat’s out of the bag on this one, Council. People are waking up to the fact that fluoride is bad for you. It needs to go the way of the dodo, and soon. Thank you.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments

  • 5/14/2011 6:25 PM jim wrote:
    If we get enough big named civil right people speaking out- It can not be ignored. Now most cities just march out the public health Bozo who repeats the standard list of quotes. It is just so sad to listen to these know nothings. Then there are always some dentists ready to speak out how they can tell when children have been protected by fluoridation. So can I because their teeth are screwed up and need cosmetic repairs. Most dentists refuse to treat poor kids on medicaid so never see the worst of the worst as they are boycotted as their is little money in treating the poor. This conflict of interest will lead to legal issues against the ADA in due course. They have taken court actions and put up big money to start or keep fluoridation. Often against cities that do not want it but commissions over ride their wishes anyway. San Diego and Watsonville Cal are two recent examples of dirty behind the scene actions. Michael Easley DDS Florida Oral Health was quoted in California as saying "Nobody drags anyone to a water faucet and makes them drink. Dig a well. Move out of the country." Shills like this are paid to protect us. He is still one of the big lobby people for mandatory fluoridation. He is no fool. I have debated him outside the commission chambers but all he does is attack for the most part. But he has actually read some of the data unlike many others in public health.
    Austin has many qualified to debate the science with far more skill they your public health schill.
    Reply to this
    1. 5/15/2011 12:45 AM M. Rae Nadler-Olenick wrote:
      We have some terrific people; unfortunately we've always been denied a platform for formal debate.  But we've got an interesting debate coming up:  see www.fluoridefreeaustin.com announcement.  The Health Department shill can't debate, but he can get
      juicy CDC grants.  He recently got one for about $7.5 million to "study" tobacco use and set up anti-tobacco "programs".  He's been milking that cow for 20 years. 
      Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.