ACC PHHSC MEETING OF 18 OCTOBER 2011: THE DOG AND PONY SHOW CONTINUES


                                     

It was the best of days, it was the worst of days, with plenty of good and bad news to report. On October 18,  a large crowd of fluoride fighters flocked to City Hall for the long-awaited City Council Public Health and Human Services Committee meeting, forcing a change of location from the modest-sized Boards and Commissions Room to Council Chambers. Among the  22 anti-fluoride speakers were concerned citizens of all stripes, including doctors, dentists, Ph.D. scientists, registered dental hygenists, nurses, computer professionals - and at least one poet.  While the meeting's focus was the addition of a health warning to the monthly utilities bill, the speakers covered their topic from a broad range of perspectives. Their 3-minute presentations were intelligent and well-crafted. Characteristically, Austin's mainstream media were a no-show, but Joe Conger, an Emmy-winning San Antonio broadcaster who's been working on a major fluoride story for weeks, came up with his cameraman.  We look forward to seeing his piece when it appears on KENS-5 TV. 

That's the good news.  The bad news:  the Committee - comprising Mike Martinez (chair), Laura Morrison, and Chris Riley - failed to act, beyond a listless motion to continue gathering "more information" from the CDC and its derivitave agencies, i.e. the same corrupt sources that have held water fluoridation in place for over half a century.  A bitter disappointment to some; to others, no surprise.

A bit of back-story here.  Last March, then-councilmember Randi Shade, who chaired this committee at the time, bowed to Fluoride Free Austin's two and a half years of persistent advocacy to hold two open meetings on the subject of water fluoridation under PHHSC's auspices.  It was the first time our cause had been given official agenda item status in many years, and resulted in two memorable, well-attended, high profile events:  the "briefing" of March 22, 2011 which allowed for extensive citizen input, and the "work session" of May 18, 2011, a quasi-debate format in which our side thoroughly trounced the fluoride boosters imported all the way from Fort Stockton for the occasion. 

We owe Shade a debt of gratitude for bringing our cause to a public forum at last.  Her purpose in holding the special meetings, as well as what might have come out of them had she stayed at the helm remain unknown.  Exactly a month later, she was defeated for relection in a closely-watched runoff with Kathie Tovo.  Replacing her on PHHSC was Chris Riley (who in 2010, smugly declared that he didn't need to be educated about fluoride).  

                                             
                                                 "...I don't need to be educated..."

Mike Martinez stepped up to the position of committee chair. 

Coincident to these events was our discovery that Mosaic Co., the city's new fluorosilicic acid vendor, includes a very explicit health warning about fluorosis - inclusive of children and infants - on its MSDS sheet.  A year ago, following a meeting with Austin health department and water utility officials, we had succeeded in getting a weakly-worded, nearly-irrelevant "warning" against mixing infant formula with tapwater placed on the Austin Water Utility website.  We now demanded a strong and precisely-worded warning, using the vendor's and the CDC's own language, be placed on the monthly utilities bill.*


For two months, between August and October, Martinez appeared to support us, albeit not in public.  According to some of our members who kept in touch with him on the issue, he told them privately that AWU lacked power to print  a such warning unless directed to do so by the Council.  The first step toward that process was approval by his committee which, he hinted, would be a virtual shoo-in.  Some of us believed him.  Others—myself included—took his words with a grain of salt, recalling prior occasions on which he had proved less than forthright.  I didn't find his Facebook “friending” of one of our members in the midst of  all this particularly appropriate, either. 


I had my own personal nightmare about how things would play out.  In my worst imaginings, the motion would sail through PHHSC, pass in full Council, and end up on the desk of the Austin Water Utility director.  The final warning would read AUSTIN FLUORIDATES ITS WATER


But that's not what happened.  What happened was.. .nothing.  Another stall.  A bitter disappointment to some; to others, no surprise.


Citizens communication began at 3:23 p.m.  After 22 anti-fluoride speakers had given their presentations, Martinez called for input from any fluoridation supporters in the audience.  There were none.  He then read the names of 13 more potential anti-fluoride speakers—cut off for lack of time—into the record.

The comittee's deliberation was brief and disgraceful, consuming just over 20 minutes.  The members ignored the previous testimony and turned to city staff for all their information.  Dr. Philip Huang, Austin/Travis County Health and Human Services medical director was conspicuously M.I.A. Representing  the agency in his absence was epidemiologist Janet Pichette, a newcomer to on-stage fluoride advocacy, who looked terrified and delivered her remarks in a quavery voice.  Next up:  the water utility’s frequent mouthpiece Jane Burazer, who made much of the city’s quarterly and annual “water quality” reports:  nothing new there.  Newly-hired Austin/Travis County PHHS director Carlos Rivera was present for part of the meeting but did not speak.

                                                                                            

Riley, who has already advertised his lack of interest in facts, called for yet more “information” from Health and Human Services and the water utility.  Morrison eagerly jumped on board, although she did cite uncontrolled dosage and informed consent as issues of  potential concern; it will be interesting to see if and when she returns to this theme.  Martinez limited his role mainly to that of moderator.  The most grotesque contribution came, toward the end, from Riley, who proposed that AWU print—in lieu of a warning—the link to the worthless (and, subliminally, pro-fluoridation) advisory already on the city's website.  Martinez chimed in  that a telephone number would also be nice.  Then Riley made a motion to stall once more, Morrison seconded, and Martinez went along without a word of dissent. Carried. 

 

So went the latest chapter.  But we can think of the battle against water fluoridation as a chess match:  a grassroots movement of an increasingly-aware citizenry against professional politicians and bureaucrats frantically circling the wagons against the public interest for the sake of their careers.  And it's our move next.  

                                                      

You can watch the proceedings (items 5 & 6) in full here
    
*********

* PROPOSED FLUORIDE WARNING:

“In January of 2011 the CDC lowered the maximum level of fluoride recommended for tap water from 1.2 ppm to 0.7 ppm. Austin currently fluoridates with hydrofluorosilicic acid at 0.7 ppm. Prolonged or repeated overexposure to fluoride compounds may cause fluorosis. Fluorosis is characterized by skeletal changes, consisting of osteosclerosis and osteomalacia and by mottled discoloration of the enamel of teeth if exposure occurs during enamel formation of children and infants. U.S. Health & Human Services reported 1-11-11 that 41% of teens have dental fluorosis.

If you are concerned about fluorosis in infants, children and seniors, risk of thyroid disease, brittle bones and risk of bone fracture, you can minimize exposure to fluoride by purchasing non-fluoridated water for daily intake, and especially for reconstitution of infant formula.”

 

 

 




 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments

  • 11/1/2011 1:02 AM Jim wrote:
    Seems like the Nestle Gerber lawsuit in Maryland Federal court should at least cause some concern. 17 damaged teeth with mild but ugly damage on one 13 year old girl. Of course this is repeated millions of times over in other kids in fluoridated cities. Austin included. With little or no informed consent with massive endorsement as safe for all and everyone benefits from public health.
    Could they be that stupid? Can they detect no risk worth mention? Did they forget even the CDC in 1999 MMWR did mention the benefit if it exists is topical not ingestion.
    The next shoe to drop will be kidney damage and of course the increased lead toxicity in kids from H2SiF6 leaching it out of brass, solder and pipe in our homes. Fluoride Class Action is pushing that point very hard in Seattle now. Almost no one thinks lead is good for kids- Not even dentists.
    What is the motivation for these commissions to act so foolish? They can not be that stupid. Good work Austin. You get great turnout to speak and stay on point.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.